Christopher,
"I challenge you to find me one of your postings where you have ever admitted that your point of veiw or opinion might not be correct. "
Do the same for yourself and Fdjake… but I remember on numerous times saying that I don’t know everything… as far as being “wrong” goes, when having differences of opinions we would have to prove each other wrong first… so if I am proven wrong on something, I wouldn’t have a problem saying… that is quite different, however, than FDjake saying that this last year was a Black Swan event, only to have it PROVEN to him that it WAS NOT…
“Stop looking at the cost to your grandchildren in the future and start looking at what could have been the cost to you and your family in the present.”
Ufortuntately, we will not have to wait until we have grandchildren or with our kids… even though the affects will last that long, we will be feeling it in our generation also…
"But you cannot deny the fact that it helped to stop a panic run on the banking system that could have been disasterous. "
That’s your opinion, but I have posted NUMEROUS links that state the opposite… Economists, PHD’s, etc… They said it at the time AND afterwards…
“Jake has you beat on this argument.”
First off, this whole “winning” thing you and Fdjake have going is your thing… I don’t keep tabs on that kind of stuff, the reader will make that decision for themself… That said, your assertion that Jake has me “beat” on this argument has indeed not been proven… it’s just your opinion… you realize that, right? I have offered COUNTERPOINT with links, etc. to his assertions which have not been refuted or addressed… so how could you intellectually come to the conclusion without bascially saying your right no matter the contradictions that exist? You may AGREE with Fdjake on his POSITION, but it is far from proven, therefore, there is nothing to “beat”…
“As I have said above hindsight is 20/20 and you are correct the stimulus was a waste as was omnibus.”
No, you have argued in other threads FOR stimulus and omnibus…
"You are arguing over semantics now. Jake has you beat on this argument. It is okay for you to admit once in awhile that maybe your point of view has some flaws. "
It is not semantics that Fdjake is completely wrong on the Black Swan Event… The Author of the Concept, Nicholas Taled, said IT WAS NOT a Black Swan Event…
So to be clear, Christophr, as I don’t want to put words in your mouth, are you saying you are “willing to come to Fdjake’s side of the debate where he argues we had a Black Swan Event this past year, even though the AUTHOR OF THE CONCEPT, Nicholas Taleb DISAGREES with him?”
That’s a very simple question and not semantics… and remember, I’m not the one who proposed this as fact, FDjake did…