Reference Book: IREM Income/Expense Analysis for Conventional Apartments -----(order online)
I spent about 20 years buying and managing apartment buildings in the past and did not ever really figure them out. I never really made cash flow and only made any profit through sales. One of biggest problems was trying to come up with the estimate of expenses for apartments.
Yesterday I saw some of your posts on trying to figure out what an apartment building in Indiana was worth and it got my interest. I dug out some old year end income/expense summaries and came up with the following summaries:
In Phoenix for a combined 62 apartment units the yearly expense was 70.2% of the gross scheduled income. No wonder I lost money. IREM says I could use 41.8%. What is wrong with this picture? Was Phoenix rents very low and expenses normal so it made the % of expenses higher?
At the same time I was managing 83 apartment units in Southern California and the yearly expense was 47.3%. IREM says I could use 42%. The two numbers are closer why?
I had the same age buildings in two different states (about 35 years old), same utilities (individual metered), same styles, same property manager but the expense % is not even close, why?
I basically quit the apartment business then but thought what could I have done different if I did it again in the same area at the same time (early to mid nineties). One thing I tried was to come up with a cost per unit per year.
$2000 per unit for one bedrooms garden style…10 = $20,000
$2250 per unit for mixed garden style…10 = $22,500
$2500 per unit for two bedrooms garden style….10 = $25,000
How would I have done financially instead of using the 35% & 40% of GSI the brokers were projecting at that time?
Actual expenses averaged in Phoenix: …………………$36000
Projection of expenses using cost per unit:……………….$34000
Broker projection of expenses (40%) of GSI: …………….$21000
If I had used the new formula in Phoenix I would have been pretty close to the actual expense figure although a little low but not $15000 low by using Broker projections.
In Southern California it looked like this:
Actual expenses averaged in S. CA………………………$61,000
Projection of expenses using cost per unit…………………$64,000
Broker projection of expenses (35%) of GSI:…………….$45,362
Better here as I would of figured high for the expenses.
Conclusion:
-
IREM: Numbers below based on averages.
Age makes a difference: older than 40 years…… Use 46% Expenes
10 years or less……Use 38% Expenses
Location makes a difference: Cold Regions;……Use 46% Expenses
Southern Regions………Use 42% Expenses
Okla, TX……………….Use 49% Expenses
CA, AZ…………………Use 37% Expenses -
I would try the % in #1 above and see how it comes out and then I would use the cost per unit as above, check my location, and make a guess but I would not figure any lower than my cost per unit guide.
Bottom Line: I still have no clue and my recommendation is to buy mobile home parks.