I have to agree 100% with Salverston. I didn’t get into commercial real estate because I had so much money laying around I didn’t know what else to do with it. I got into it because the BS of dealing with the VELVET HAMMERS (residential real estate) got to be a pain in the *ss.
My commercial properties could be managed by my 7 year old son. I build most of my properties so I never pay retail. I have a very wealthy friend about 60 years old, he told me straight out… “We all start out in residential, as you learn and earn you realize that banging your head against the same wall over and over again evenually starts to hurt.” To me that sums up renting homes or apartments to individuals. I’ve done it, I made money doing it, and I’m glad I will never have to do it again.
Compared to renting a home or apartment, my commercial tenants have about the same legal rights as share croppers did in the 1920’s. It’s a BUSINESS, not someone’s HOME. I can not stress how big a of difference that is.
Nothing in this world beats a triple net lease on a commercial building with a 4% anual rate increase.
Done both…never going back.
Try this… take a look at some single family homes in commercial areas. I’ve purchased Colonials on busy streets, ripped the roofs off, coverted them to a flat roof, and covered them in Dry Vit. INSTANT commercial doctors/insurance/dentist office! I have one building that I purchased after a fire a few years back that now generates over $100,000 in annual income. Show me a single family home that can do that. That’s what this building was, by changing it to better fit the needs of the area (hospital down the street) it became a gold mine.
But if your making money and your area is better suited to single family home rentals, your a winner. It really doesn’t matter, either one will make you rich. I don’t agree at all with your assessment that just rich people own commercial property. You can do it either way. It WILL take more money to own a commercial building, but in MY experience there is absolutely no comparison as to which is more profitable. Commercial wins by a landslide.
The great thing about residential rentals is the amount of knowledge you gain doing it. I guarentee that you will use the exact same methods when you buy your first commercial property. If your buying your single families for 60 cents on the dollar you should be looking to do the same for any commercial building you look at. Remember, there are lot’s of rich people out there like Attorneys, Doctors, ect. who don’t like getting dirty. These guy’s buy the types of buildings your buddy has. They pay top dollar and just pick up a return.
That is NOT the way I do commercial property. I try and find a building that I can convert or land I can buy for a certain use. The fact that I have 20+ years experience as a GC is an enormous advantage. Doctors, and Lawyers don’t have the time, knowledge or desire to get into these projects. Your doing everything, right now, that is required to be a successful commercial investor. Compared to residential homes commercial property is a joke to build. Think about it, steel studs, dry wall (no plaster) no fancy kitchens, no fancy bathrooms, no media rooms, commercial carpet on everything in the office. If it’s a warehouse, even easier, machine finished concrete.
Don’t take this the wrong way, because it’s meant to be totally constructive…But, instead of trying to find reasons why commercial ISN’T better, look for reasons why it IS better. There’s a reason no one rents 300 single family homes. It’s 300 times easier to own a few commercial buildings instead. At $60,000 each 300 single family homes equals $18,000,000. You could EASILY cover that amount with just 10 commercial properties.
Think about the difference in AGGREVATION!