To make a long story shorter, our tenant needed to break the lease due to a job loss and was planning to move out three weeks ago, so we schedule outside maintenance on the house for after their move date. A week before they were supposed to move out, they asked to stay two more weeks. This wasn’t a problem for us due to our schedule, so we said they could stay as long as they accommodated the contractor (replace four windows and exterior paint). They agreed. The contractor started this week as scheduled, and we have had no end of complaints from the tenant regarding the noise – complaints multiple times a day. He is replacing some trim, so he is using a hammer. He does not have a radio on or making any noise other than what you would expect from construction. Now that tenant is quoting their rights regarding the property not being liveable, etc. In the mean time, the tenant has not paid the rent for this month, so that payment is nearly a month late, which we have discussed with them probably much too politely. It was late before the construction even started.
Wow, I’m shocked. The reaction we have gotten is unbelievable especially considering that we have been extremely accommodating of them. You might think the tenant is just trying to get out of paying the rent for this month, but without going into a very long explanation, I don’t think this is the case.
This situation brings up a few questions. First, does the tenant have the right to refuse or limit the work we can do on the inside or outside of the house while they are living there? Is there a difference when it comes to interior versus exterior work? Does it matter whether they have broken the contract? Our lease states we will give them 24 hours notice before entering the property, and includes the typical maintenance responsibilities clauses.
Do tennants generally punish you for anything good you try to do for them?