That’s really restrictive. I guess Kansas doesn’t care about those who have been kicked around credit wise. They can go suck eggs.
Meantime, in California, we can only collect 2x’s the contract rent as a deposit. If we want to safely rent to those with iffy credit and get over-retail rents, then we are forced to rewrite the contract rent for whatever works to allow us to get the deposits we want.
I’ve posted this before, but for example, in a 55-community house I manage, I had a prospect tell me she had awful credit and an iffy income; not in those words, of course. I told her that I was unable to collect the deposits legally to overcome the risk of renting to her. Actually I could, but I really wasn’t interested in her offer as you’ll see why in a moment.
Meantime, she offered me a cosigner. I asked who this was. She said it was her attorney-friend. I said, ‘No attorney-friends as cosigners, thanks.’
She called me back a day, or so, later, and suggested something quite creative and tempting to me in order to overcome her ‘problem(s).’
She said she really liked the house and was willing to pay me $900/mo for the house if I would work with her. I asked what she had in mind.
Her proposal went something like this:
Contract Rent: $1500/mo. (more than twice the market rent)
Ontime Payment Credit: $600
Effective Rent: $900/mo (roughly $200 over retail)
Retail Rent: 700 (give or take)
Deposit: 2x’s Contract Rent> $3,000
Prepaid Rent: 2x’s Contract Rent> $3000 (3+/mos of ‘on time’ rents)
Total Deposit(s): $6000
So, with six thousand in the bank and three months of on time rent prepaid, it seemed like a deal for me. I would have taken the offer …if the house was mine, but it belonged to my church.
If anything had gone wrong (which it wouldn’t have, but if it had…), the church might end up in the paper with a headline reading:
[b]
“Church Gouges Elderly Woman! News At 11”
[/b]