IRO,
Avoid being the classic, low-budget operator. Blowing a buck, trying to save ten cents.
Issue: You manage your managers.
Issue: You choose your managers based on reputation and performance, and fire any that don’t perform as predicted or expected.
Issue: Anyone you manage will attempt to take advantage of you somehow, someway, sometime …tenants …managers …vendors …contractors …etc. Stop chasing the unicorns of management perfection.
Issue: You have leverage over a professional, that you don’t have over a tenant, when things go wrong.
Issue: Sure, the manager might cost what it would cost you to replace the AC every five years. However, without a manager, you’re gonna replace the AC anyway, AND manage yourself anyway, so now it’s gonna cost you twice.
Theoretically, if you hired a competent, professional manager you wouldn’t be replacing (or paying for) a 60-month A/C unit, because the manager would have exercised more efficient supervision over your tenants than you would. It’s his business. It’s your hobby. Two different things.
Issue: What’s your time worth. It’s not like real estate manages itself for free, just because you do it for free. It means you don’t value your time. That’s fine. Many people don’t.
Issue: If you’re not making more off your property than a property manager would cost, then you’re not really investing well enough in the first place.
Issue: It’s enormously difficult to find SFH’s that are much more than appreciation plays, where management costs must be front-loaded, if not borrowed, from future appreciation, and/or debt reduction.
Issue: Any management hiccup you have is YOUR fault, not your tenant’s. Tenant’s lie, cheat, and steal, and did I mention lie? So, that’s the operating assumption, and so it’s up to you to uncover the lies, cheating, and stealing, and give a tenant a reason not to lie, cheat, and steal from you.
Issue: Your security deposit requirements, don’t give your tenant’s enough inventive to live by the rules, much less pay for a damaged A/C unit (evidently).
Issue: Renting to 3 unmarried adults is ‘not’ renting to “quality” tenants. It’s renting to ‘the best alternative’ available that you considered ‘qualified’. There’s a difference.
Issue: I can “qualify” a raccoon, if the deposit it big enough, and a co-signer is strong enough. So, “Qualified” is a subjective term.
Issue: A “quality” tenant for a 3/2/2 in a blue collar neighborhood, would be a married couple, with two children, both working at the same jobs for five years, and are looking to buy their own home. They pay their bills, are concerned about their credit, they’re not overextended financially, and they make 4 times the rent in combined incomes. These tenants are extremely hard to attract, because every landlord known to mankind is trying to attract them.
Meantime, anything less than that, needs to be “qualified” with larger deposits and co-signers. Credit and income isn’t the only criteria for qualifying tenants. It’s also the quality of the family unit, and their associations.
For example, is dad running around on the wife? Is he an alcohol abuser? How about the wife? Are they headed for divorce? Are the the kids under control, or are they little, dysfunctional hellions acting out on their parent’s marital dysfunctions? A trained, experienced property manager would pick up clues, and weigh his options, when leasing your house to this family.
Issue: You would be explaining to your selected property manager, what your goals were, and seeing how they fit the market and demand for what you currently offer. You would want an understanding regarding the trade-off required between camping on the rents, versus maintaining a zero vacancy factor, and/or achieving something in between.
FWIW