I am trying to decide if I should put 5% down, even though I have 20%…
I am a first time home buyer in PA who is getting ready to purchase a $258k house as my primary residence (long term). In 6 to 12 months, I plan on also acquiring an investment property ( fix & flip or get a rental – $200k range) for a monthly cash flow or selling profit. Credit score is 793 with 70k+ income.
If I have about $50k dedicated for real estate investments, what would be the optimal plan for leveraging these finances in order to obtain good interest rate loans, low monthly payments, without tying up my cash long term or taking on high risk.
For my first primary residence, here are the options I’m considering…(assume 5.5% Fixed 30 Year for both) After $10k in improvements, the house will be worth about $280k
Option 1:
Put 5% down ($12, 900)
$1395 mortgage + $155 mortgage insurance = $1550
$37,100 left for other investment property (6% mortgage)
Preserve cash flow and maybe make extra principal payments at some point
Option 2:
Put 10% down ($25,800)
$1320 mortgage + $140 PMI (?) = $1460
I am confident I could cancel PMI within two years when I am 80 LTV ($3800 PMI over 2 years)
Leaves $24,200 for second property down payment
Option 3:
Put 20% down ($51,200)
$1150 mortgage (No PMI!)
Would have to use HELOC to obtain other investment property (7-8%). I’ve read it is dangerous (and sometimes difficult) to use a HELOC for a second property down payment.
With Option 3, putting an extra $38,300 down would yield $400 more cash flow a month than Option 1. (4800 per year). This is like a 12% first year return on that $38,300 - instead of 3% in the bank, etc.
Maybe it is subjective, but I would like to hear your thoughts on these various options if you were in my position?