Rob offered an excellent answer.
Getting a license really depends on what you’re trying to accomplish.
Some downsides to being licensed are the perpetual, legal and financial liabilities. There’s a hoard of regulations governing licensees.
Agents are not taught how to think creatively, or even to negotiate beyond “garage sale” style bargaining.
Agents who negotiate steal deals for themselves, are the same ones being sued by disgruntled sellers, who realize after the fact, how much equity they gave away.
And courts routinely rule against agents in court in these instances.
Actually, any real estate professional who buys for himself, is at risk of loss, in the event the transaction is litigated. The assumption is the RE professional knows better what he’s doing, and so it stands that by comparison, the sellers are all mouth-breathing, slack-jawed boobs being filleted by the agent/investor …and therefor universally liable for damages to the seller.
All that said, a licensee/investor has more credibility with other agents who are leads to deals.
My wholesaler friend Todd got his license last year for that reason.
I questioned him on this. He said the credibility he has with other agents, as a licensee, opens door to information about deals that is otherwise not available, even to “pocket buyers.”
Notwithstanding, this results in just a small source of deals.
The bulk of his deals come from direct mail advertising.
Another upside, as an agent he can also list ‘wholesale’ deals that don’t fit his criteria.
For me, I don’t want to expose myself to 3rd party scrutiny of my deals, or business practices. I can do what works, not what fits the political agendas of the bureaucrats that govern agents.
I can still mine pocket listings from agents, who don’t have a pipeline of buyers, or a list of agent/investors, etc.
Hope that helps.