Here is the scoop. The deal is good, but I would like many opinions on what I think is a matter of principle.
I found the deal with my business partner. We put the property under contract and brought in 2 additional partners. One of the partners is a real estate agent. The agent negotiated a great deal on the buy side and deserves his commission on the buy side, keep in mind though that he did not know what the true value of the property was, and that is why I had him put it under contract immediately. The agent then listed the property on the sell side for about $100K below market. I told him to do this to move the property fast.
His part of the sales commission on the back-end will amount to about $20K, this is not including the $100K plus that he will make in profit for his share of the deal. The $20K is taking into consideration that his broker will make about $5K of the $25K sellers commission.
My thinking is that he is one of the partners, “We brought him in”, and think he should put his sales commission on the backend toward the profits for all of the 4 partners to split. I think that me finding the property, doing the research on the zoning, highest and best use, etc. at least equals what he is done. I also think that the sale on the back end was a slam dunk because I told him exactly what to put in the listing to sell it fast and to price it well below market. We received 2 contracts at full price in less than 10 days on the market.
Who is being the most greedy? Me or the agent? I tried to explain that he does not see the value in what I am doing in terms of the financial analysis, etc.?
You will not hurt my feelings by being honest, and I truly respect everyone’s opinion here on this board.
Thanks,
Mr. Greedy.