Wait a sec. I must be reading this wrong because this deal sounds like something that should NOT be done. Why would you try to sell a house for $165,000 in an area where the max value is $150,000?
Remember, a very common mistake beginning investors make is trying to create a market. They over improve the homes. If you go to an area selling $100,000 homes, and fix up a home with superior materials, etc and then try to sell it at $150,000, you will fail. The people that want a $150,000 home go to a $150,000 neighborhood. People that want a $100,000 home will look at your house.
Where is your profit in the above deal? You make your profit at the purchase, not hoping for the best when you sell. Always know your minimum profit when you offer and if you do more than that, that’s great. When you said “It’s a start”, if you do this deal like you’ve posted here, it will be the beginning of the end. You wil lose out and then lose interest in investing because you’ve failed. If you try to wholesale the deal, you will lose credibility with your buyers. This is what I get from your numbers:
Max after repair value sounds like $150,000 which may be high considering it starts at $85,000 but let’s use the $150,000. Your contract is for $135,000. Estimating low for 3% realtor commission on the sale that’s $4,050, estimate another 3% for closing costs that’s another $4,050. With this alone, your profit is $6,900. This does not include any repairs or updating, holding costs and if you use a realtor to market it afterwards, the 5-6% commission they will charge for the flip sale. An iffy $6,900 profit is not a deal.
I use the following formula when making an offer. I take the ARV less realtor commissions for both the purchase and the flip sale, less the estimated repair costs, less holding costs, and take 70% of the amount that’s left. That’s my offer price. This way I know what my minimum profit is up front.