Look at one thing: I am not married.
Excuse for failure.
Many successful investors have that element of support and automatic trust with other married investors.
Excuse for failure.
They have dual incomes if they want. They have a partner probably looking for properties with them on weekends, assisting them. (Of course being married is not always a good thing, big things can go wrong with the wrong partner, but don’t Bankers think married people are more worthy of a loan?)
No. Bankers look at financial statements and perhaps the married couple has a better, combined debt to income ratio. Otherwise, no.
Secondly they all had jobs.
Excuse for failure.
They had steady jobs.
Excuse for failure.
They had easy entrance into jobs.
Excuse for failure.
They had less competition then today.
Really bad excuse for failure.
Today there is an immense disconnect between generations of people. I have applied for entry level jobs and at the interviews they often say that 200, 300, even 500 other people applied.
Stop doing that. Apply where nobody applies. Jobs that few want pay more as a rule. Apply to smaller employers who are aren’t perpetually holding job fairs to avoid violating federal employment discrimination regulations.
Also these mom and pop investors are drawing off of social security.
Excuse for failure.
I will never see that.
Excuse for failure.
They are drawing off pension plans (some of them are phenomenal) and those are almost entirely wiped out for my generation.
More reasons to succeed. Forget Social Security. Another scarcity mentality issue.
Also it seems like home ownership was just a normal phase of life back then.
Excuse for failure., and not true.
Today kids can barely afford to rent let alone save enough for a down payment.
Excuse for failure, and age old struggle. If it weren’t a struggle, nobody would call it the American Dream. They would call it a liability.
The list goes on and on. I’m sort of pointing out that the “example” of experienced real estate investors I’ve seen has probably been augmented and distorted, you know?
YES.
About Donald Trump: he was sent to the finest financial school in the nation. Then his dad, who was already one of the top real estate people in the New York City borough of Manhattan. !!, Then his dad landed him into the best network of real estate people in the city. Then he was given Millions Of Dollars to get started. !!
Excuse for failure.
That is a huge difference comparing my questions to Trump, but I understand everything you say.
No, you don’t understand Trump. Trump is ambitious. Trump’s siblings had the same advantages, yet none of the others made it big, and one died an alcoholic. Success for Trump was a choice, not a fate, regardless of the initial advantages.
Its not some sob story here, but I do not have family.
Excuse for failure.
That is an immensely helpful component for growth. I suppose family could be very negative too, but either way, family is huge.
It can, or it can’t, but it’s not a definition of success, unless you make it that way. Donald Trump lost most of his first fortune after marrying and divorcing his first Ukrainian wife, then slowly made it back while dating and later marrying and divorcing his second wife, and continued becoming a multi-billionaire while dating, marrying, and having a fourth kid at SIXTY (give or take) with his third, and Ukrainian wife. So, he made a fortune despite failing at marriages and juggling a family. None of them had anything to contribute to his wealth building except for being trophy wives, except his first wife did manage one of his buildings.
So look also I do not have a 401K to draw off of.
Excuse for failure.
- Other investors told me they got started by just cashing in on all the stocks that their job gave them over the years.
- These people were working fruitful jobs. Sure they were “working hard” but in my case since the Great Recession * I have been applying for jobs for years, more years then I care to admit.
- I have been unemployed, to self employed and not making enough money, to over-employed and underpaid with a toxic workplace to be fired for no reason, to underemployed again and seeking employment, to self employed struggling and underemployed juggling two underpaying jobs with no opportunity for advancement.
- None of them offer the benefits these mom and pops all seem to have had.
Excuses for failure.
I am probably not unique in these scenarios.
[u]No, you’re not, but you’re saying you are, and this is what you need to avoid doing like the plague. Otherwise, it’s just another excuse for failure.[/i]
Its a different world today. Corporations used to pay relocation expenses. They used to pay to fly people out to be interviewed. And if they were hired they would get bonuses and all kinds of perks added on. That is all gone now. Literally the employee was in the drivers seat back then.
In what universe? No it’s not. Another excuse for failure.
Today the employer is in the drivers seat and they are expected to be very shrewd.
Companies exist to make money, not employ people. People are a necessary expense in order for the company to make money. Stop anthropomorphizing business and making it personal. Another excuse for failure.
That nice land of the free cushion is not so much there anymore. That comfy and fluffy pink cloud from the 70’s through the 90’s is gone.
The only pink clouds in the 1970’s and following were LSD-induced figments of someone’s imagination, or what is called a “smog alert” in downtown Los Angeles during any late-evening inversion layer.
In grade school I remember first hearing the definition for Landlord. First I thought “lord” was tied to royalty. I thought of Robin Hood how royalty owned all of the land and peasants had very little and worked very hard to be on the land. Meanwhile the royalty ate the best food and wore the finest clothes and had a pampered lifestyle with unlimited opportunity. That concept was probably the norm throughout much of history where money begets more money. It was not so easy to just move from being born a peasant into a higher class and to own your own land and have slaves and have every amenity to think of. Those peasant were generally restricted to that class.
Education today is not even a sure fire way to rise into a higher class.
Excuses for failure.
It’s only a door of many, but it’s not a guarantee. It never has been.
Otherwise, it’s a myth perpetuated by the education industry.
Today people graduate and have a lifetime of Debit to pay off. It is just that a lot has changed…
[b][i]That’s truer than ever.
BTW, too many investors don’t really start making money, until their fifties. Just saying. And perhaps it’s because it took them a couple of decades to overcome all the hurdles you’ve outlined. I don’t know.
One person I respect said, “Until the guy is less distracted by women; forced to sober up; and take responsibility for his actions, he’s likely not going to get rich, or stay rich. It’s a sacrifice and commitment he isn’t willing to accept, until he sees that more than half his life is gone.”
There comes a point (that can come at any age) for the ones who make it, when they make a decision to make it, and commit to the decision. For many that doesn’t come until well after they’ve screwed around for thirty or forty years. [/i][/b]