Gary,
“The main difference I see between the two methods is that you (or your entity) go on title and I don’t, nor is my name or entity on any loans. With the trust, title is always in the name of the Trustee and the trust is Beneficiary-directed.”
This is why the Attorney Generals office in North Carolina has a problem with trusts, they consider it fraud “hiding ownership” and until you stand tall in front of the AG’s office with your trust then I see no proof it will with stand the test. Here is how you get tested, if someone files a complaint with the AG’s office they investigate and you can at this point defend it.
My entity does not go on any loan, others methods apparently have not been explained to you properly.
Now if your method has never been tested recently in North Carolina by someone filing a complaint, again I say then we can see the outcome if and when it happens.
“Second difference is the extra measure of asset protection including probate avoidance.”
Been there done that without problems.
You see Gary I am the type of person who investigates my method of investing so I do not give out false information that could get an investor in trouble.
Also I handle things “Pro Se” (means without an attorney) when problems arise. This started a while ago when I had to educate attorney’s on Subject To investing and found that the majority of them had no clue. “Pro Se” recent example also in Federal Court:
www.DoNotDoIt.com
Let me go on with just one senario that happened as I had a call from an attorney (realtor’s attorney, guess they thought I was buying and selling houses without a license and I just took a deal away from them) who told me I was going to the Creative Investing Jail, because what I was doing was illegal. When I finished explaining how it really worked he told me about his credit problems and needed a house could I find one for him and he would purchase under Contract for Deed.
So when I give advice about investing it is done from really having done deals, not out of some course book or written by someone who couldn’t spell investing before they published.
The one thing I have not done is answer every post with this is the only way you can do creative investing, there are investing methods that I chose not to do, however if someone asks me I will give them the pro’s and con’s on any method that I am aquainted with. This I do also very sparingly.
You apparently are new to posting on an open discussion boards so there are some things that you can do that will provide you with what you are after (people joining your group or whatever it is called) without roughing up some investors who have also been there and done that without NARS or some new person looking to learn.
One last thing I read the innuendos in your posts that are very well placed hoping it will be over looked for instance… “The main difference I see between the two methods is that you (or your entity) go on title and I don’t, nor is my name or entity on any loans”… there was no difference here, however by reading what you said one might assume so.
Thus far all you have is a method of investing that offers no more than other methods that are consistant with proper creative investing.
John $Cash$ Locke